Back Home About Us Contact Us
Town Charters
Seniors
Federal Budget
Ethics
Hall of Shame
Education
Unions
Binding Arbitration
State - Budget
Local - Budget
Prevailing Wage
Jobs
Health Care
Referendum
Eminent Domain
Group Homes
Consortium
TABOR
Editorials
Tax Talk
Press Releases
Find Representatives
Web Sites
Media
CT Taxpayer Groups
 
Eminent Domain
Please note that if you have received more than one copy of this email publication, wish to be removed from FCTO's email list, or add a friend, please notify FCTO at fctopresident@aol

March 1, 2012

 

From The Federation of Connecticut

Taxpayer Organizations, Inc. 
Contact Susan Kniep, President

Website: http://ctact.org/
Email:
fctopresident@aol.com

Telephone: 860-841-8032

 

 

 

House Passes Anti-Kelo Eminent Domain Bill

A copy of the bill, H.R. 1443, is available here.

NJTODAY.NET  by Anthony F. Della PelleNew Jersey Condemnation Law

http://njtoday.net/2012/03/01/house-passes-anti-kelo-eminent-domain-bill/

 

The United States House of Representatives this week passed bipartisan legislation that proposes to withhold for two years all federal development funding to states or local governments that take private property for economic development.  The bill, labeled the Private Property Rights Protection Act (H.R. 1443), also bars the federal government from using eminent domain for economic development purposes and gives private property owners the right to take legal action if provisions of the legislation are violated.

The legislation was sponsored by an unusual combination of lawmakers –Wisconsin Republican Congressman James Sensenbrenner and California Democratic Congresswoman Maxine Waters.  It received nearly unanimous support, with only Michigan Democrat John Conyers voicing opposition.  Congresswoman Waters stated that her support for the bill comes in part from the idea that poor people and minorities stand the most to lose from the use of eminent domain for economic redevelopment, where powerful developers or other politically-connected people or companies may prosper at the expense of those who are poor or week.

This is the latest effort by federal legislators to curb the use of eminent domain for economic development, and to minimize abuses of the government’s condemnation power.  A similar bill was passed by the House in late 2005, months after the controversial ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court in City of New London v. Kelo, but did not gain approval in the Senate.

The current bill will now move on to the Senate for consideration.  We’ll be watching to see if this version gets any further than its predecessor.

Originally published by New Jersey Condemnation Law; republished with permission

Related articles